Gigya info-graphic on the different social network identities people are using to sign-in online



Comments [0]

Comments [1]
People have different levels of expertise on various subjects. When it comes to marketing, however, this fact is generally ignored. Marketing services actively search for potential influencers to promote various items. These influencers range from “cool” teenagers, local opinion lead- ers, all the way to popular public figures. However, the advertised items are often far outside the domain of expertise of these hired individuals. So how effective are these mar- keting strategies? Can a person’s influence in one area be transferred to other areas? The answer is yes.
Our study provides several findings that have direct implications in the design of social media and viral marketing: 1) Analysis of the three influence measures provides a better understanding of the different roles users play in social media. Indegree represents popularity of a user; retweets represent the content value of one’s tweets; and mentions represent the name value of a user. Hence, the top users based on the three measures have little overlap. 2) Our finding on how influence varies across topics could serve as a useful test for answering how effective adver- tisement in Twitter would be if one is to employ influential users. Our analysis shows that most influential users hold significant influence over a variety of topics. 3) Ordinary users can gain influence by focusing on a single topic and posting creative and insightful tweets that are perceived as valuable by others, as opposed to simply conversing with others.
The most followed users span a wide variety of public figures and news sources. They were news sources (CNN, New York Times), politicians (Barack Obama), athletes (Shaquille O’Neal), as well as celebrities like actors, writers, musicians, and models (Ashton Kutcher, Britney Spears). As the list suggests, indegree measure is useful when we want to identify users who get lots of at- tention from their audience through one-on-one interactions, i.e., the audience is directly connected to influentials.
The most retweeted users were content aggregation services (Mashable, TwitterTips, TweetMeme), businessmen (Guy Kawasaki), and news sites (The New York Times, The Onion). They are trackers of trending topic and knowledge- able people in different fields, whom other users decide to retweet. Unlike indegree, retweets represent influence of a user beyond one’s one-to-one interaction domain; popular tweets could propagate multiple hops away from the source before they are retweeted throughout the network. Further- more, because of the tight connection between users as sug- gested in the triadic closure (Granovetter 1973), retweeting in a social network can serve as a powerful tool to reinforce a message—for instance, the probability of adopting an in- novation increases when not one but a group of users repeat the same message (Watts and Dodds 2007).
The most mentioned users were mostly celebrities. Ordinary users showed a great passion for celebrities, regularly posting messages to them or mentioning them, without nec- essarily retweeting their posts. This indicates that celebrities are often in the center of public attention and celebrity gossip is a popular activity among Twitter users.
Finally, we found that influence is not gained spontaneously or accidentally, but through concerted effort. In order to gain and maintain influence, users need to keep great personal involvement.
Comments [0]

Good to see some stats on this but no surprise. Social media is all about being up close and personal so it's all about providing special things that are not available to everyone and talking to individuals (I should shut up, we haven't done either yet actually).
Read the original article here
http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007449
Comments [0]

Must read for whoever tries to use Twitter as a media channel. Check out the original article below, contains some amazing hints (but take with a grain of salt).
Comments [0]
It seems to me that more and more businesses now have corporate twitter accounts and given that most blog publishing platforms now have Twitter integrations, this has become the channel of choice to follow business news updates rather than RSS. The below Google Trends search term data doesn't prove that but at least supports the theory to some extend. Your thoughts?
Comments [1]
According to Edelman's TweetLevel service that just launched Datalicious's influence score is 32.1. Another metric for our social media toolbox that we'll be tracking going forward.
Edelman uses over 30 metrics to create the algorithm behind the index in order to attempt to give a clearer picture of who is actually important in the twittersphere (given our score of 32 I'm not sure I want to believe they're accurate but we'll keep trying and checking our score).
There are four result metrics:
Each score is rated out of 100, in other words, the higher your score, the more important you are. More details on the actual formula can be found below (and thanks for making this public Edelman, we need more service providers with that open attitude).
Comments [0]
The top 0.1% of observed Twitter users climbed 275% in Twitter followers between March and June, while the top 1% increased only 146% in comparison, and the top 10% gained only 126%. Even when analyzing the median followers, the stats paint a clear picture: the top 0.1%, 1% and 10% of researched Twitter users saw their follower base grow by 78%, 65% and 59% respectively.
The research is really no surprise, the more followers you have the faster your follower numbers grow, on Twitter and in real life. However, how could one speed up the growth? Will we soon see people driving paid search traffic to their Twitter profiles?
http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/09/03/as-twitter-continues-to-grow-popular-users-widen-the-gap/
Comments [0]
The debate is still out on Twitter’s effectiveness as a marketing tool, but new data from Penn State plays right into the company’s move to fully open users’ status updates to advertisers. Companies are already getting targeted, free advertising on Twitter, as the research found that 20 percent of all tweets—or one out of every five updates—mention specific brand names or products. (See recent tweets mentioning Sprint or Trader Joes, for example).
As for the value of these branded tweets, it seems that there’s room to glean qualitative analysis about brand perception and affinity from them, at least. Jansen said micro-blogging could ultimately be on par with e-mail “in terms of its communication impact” for advertisers; the research team will continue to study Twitter and its impact on the business sector in order to form more concrete conclusions.
http://paidcontent.org/article/419-1-out-of-5-tweets-mention-brands-products/
Comments [0]
Comments [0]